🔗 Share this article

Jelly Bean’s offspring Bertie Botts is an adorable small “playful character”. The whale Orion – nicknamed “Onion Ring” – is a large but fiercely protective friend. Another whale, Zephyr has “endless energy” and sways like a worm. Lillooet the beluga is the “most affectionate” with a kind nature.

Thirty enclosed marine mammals in a Canada-based entertainment facility have been entangled in a disagreement between a closed attraction, local and national governments and advocacy groups.

But those most familiar with the whales say the impassioned debate over their fate often overlooks the individual traits of the whales who, after growing up in captivity, have been thoroughly researched by the caretakers who see them each day.

After the federal government disallowed the transfer of the belugas to China, the controversial facility near the famous falls where they are housed stated it would consider to euthanize them unless the authorities covers the cost of their care. The nation’s fisheries minister has refused that request, placing the thirty whales in an increasingly precarious position.

Highly Cognitive Marine Mammals

Researchers say that beluga whales’ neuroanatomy, along with their mimicry abilities, cognitive challenges and group interactions point to they are deeply intelligent creatures – something one caretaker observed personally.

She spent a significant period as a beluga trainer, a job that required earning the trust of the sea creatures.

“Developing those connections over time takes a lot of regularity and a lot of love. At the beginning, they’re very wary of you,” she said. “Eventually, you gain shared confidence. And they start being more vulnerable with you. It’s just so magical and fulfilling.”

The trainer knew the whales were highly intelligent, but she says she was even so astounded by the nuances and idiosyncrasies in their characters. She developed a special affection for Eve and Cleopatra with different personalities.

“Eve selected me. The other demanded work,” she said. “Both altered the way I perceive relationships.”

Growing Opposition and Facility Decline

Burgess’s relationship with the whales developed against a backdrop of rising activist criticism to their confinement.

During her three years at the attraction, multiple belugas and the park’s single killer whale, Kiska, passed away. In all, nineteen belugas have died at the park since 2019, a toll which the park links to expected lifespan, but which advocates say indicates the poor conditions in which they were housed.

The park did not admit visitors to the public over the recent season, but Burgess says she saw with her own eyes consequences of the shutdown. “Structural materials is breaking off from the pools because they’re degrading and not being repaired. The whales are curious and so they grab fragments and swim around with pieces in their jaws. It’s distressing to see.”

The park did not comment to a inquiry, but earlier claimed: “The whales … obtain far better health care and constant supervision than any person in the Britain, or elsewhere.”

Uncertain Future and Potential Resolutions

Burgess was fired from the facility in the spring following the death of Eos, an ailing beluga the caretakers had to humanely kill. She said the park thought details of the incident were disclosed to the news outlets and she was fired soon after.

The uncertainty over the whales’ fate has left Burgess and other caretakers in despair. She says the park’s warning to euthanize its whales is a negotiation tactic and is a “practically unfeasible” undertaking, adding any efforts to humanely kill even a one beluga would require “significant staff”, vehicles and specialized tools.

“It’s impossible in hell the staff would ever do it,” she said.

She backs requests for the whales to be removed immediately from the facility, with its crumbling tanks and reduced personnel.

In late September, the nation’s government official turned down a bid to send the whales to an overseas location.

“To approve the application would have meant a continued existence in confinement and a reversion to public entertainment,” the official wrote. “As society, we know that whales should be in the ocean, not in tanks for our amusement. I could not in ethical standing permit an export that would perpetuate the conditions these belugas have experienced.”

But Burgess said the minister’s comments reflect a broader misunderstanding of the facts of living conditions for belugas living their whole lives in enclosures.

“The public needs to realize these are whales that have lived entirely in captivity and they will need constant supervision for the foreseeable future,” she said. “People just don’t comprehend that it’s not as easy as saying ‘close it down’.”

Alternative Habitat and Ongoing Debate

As decision makers work to find a answer, proposals have surfaced, some of which have little basis in reality. A suggested plan called for the belugas to be released into the open waters of the Arctic – where whales are a key source of nourishment for Inuit communities.

A suggested protected area in the region of eastern Canada, which has received official endorsement, has shown to be most controversial. The planned site, which includes extensive space of penned in ocean, is not yet built. Supporters remain positive that it could eventually represent a sustainable resolution for some of the whales.

But, Burgess says, among trainers she’s discussed with, there is “skepticism there” about what she said is “simply an trial” in the whales’ fate.

Different voices say the idea of a sanctuary represents a changing attitudes away from zoos and aquariums and could represent a viable approach in the coming months.

Charles Vinick, leader of the initiative, said the site will replicate the mental engagement and diet the whales get from specialists, albeit in a much larger area. He said after the health of whales is completely examined, which could take months|an extended period|