🔗 Share this article

The Russian central bank has announced it is seeking damages valued at $230 billion against the securities depository Euroclear. This move constitutes a clear response by the Kremlin against proposals to use frozen Russian state assets to support Ukraine.

The Substantial Demand

Based on accounts in local state media, the monetary authority initiated a claim last week for an estimated 18 trillion roubles. This sum corresponds to the aforementioned $230 billion demand.

EU leaders will decide later this week regarding a plan to leverage around €210 billion in frozen Russian state funds. The proposal entails providing Ukraine with a substantial loan to finance its defence and financial needs.

The vast majority of these funds, totaling €185 billion, are held at the Euroclear depository in Brussels. Euroclear acts as the main keeper for the Kremlin's frozen sovereign wealth.

A Clash Over Legality

EU authorities have argued that their plan is on solid legal ground. They argue rests on the fact that ownership of the state assets remains with Russia, despite being it was frozen in European jurisdictions following the 2022 invasion of Ukraine.

The Russian government, in contrast, has called any utilization of the funds as illegal appropriation. It has threatened retaliatory measures, such as seizing European private investors' holdings within Russia.

The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, who has assumed a prominent position in peace negotiations, stated on a social media platform that Russia "will prevail in court" and retrieve its funds. He added that the European Union, the euro, and Euroclear "will suffer" from the plan.

Wider Implications

With statements seen as an effort to drive a wedge between Europe and the United States, Dmitriev characterized the assets plan as "a vicious assault on property rights and the global financial system established by the United States."

The clearing house declined to provide a statement on the new lawsuit. The institution has in the past noted it is contending with more than 100 legal cases in Russian jurisdictions.

Enforcement Challenges

While judges in European nations are not expected to enforce judgments from Russian courts, analysts anticipate Moscow to pursue enforcement in nations with closer relations to the Kremlin.

"The Bank of Russia could try to enforce a Russian court's decision against Euroclear in countries such as China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other friendly nations, if relevant holdings can be identified," commented a legal expert from an international firm.

European Safeguards

European authorities indicated they are developing steps to discourage other countries from assisting any Russian lawsuits against European entities. Additionally, they are crafting protections to protect EU member states with assets in Russia from what they call "unlawful expropriation."

How the Funding Would Work

According to the complex plan, the EU would issue an first €90 billion loan to Ukraine, backed by the proceeds generated from the frozen assets at Euroclear. Critically, Russia's ownership claim on the principal funds would remain untouched.

Ukraine would only be required to return the money if and when Russia consented to pay reparations for the immense destruction inflicted during the nearly four-year conflict.

Other Funding Ideas

The Belgian government, backed by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has asked the EU to examine an alternative method for funding Ukraine. This entails joint EU borrowing to secure a loan, using unallocated funds within the European budget.

This alternative move, nevertheless, requires unanimity among all 27 EU countries. The Hungarian government, considered friendly with the Kremlin, has already expressed its objection.

Commenting on Monday, the EU top diplomat, a senior official, said the reparations loan as "the strongest solution" for aiding Ukraine. "The reparations loan is based on the Russian immobilized funds, meaning it doesn't come from our taxpayers' money, which is also significant," she remarked. "It also delivers a powerful message that when you do all this damage to another nation, you have to pay for the rebuilding."